According to a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, testing saliva samples are effective in detecting asymptomatic Covid-19 cases .

For the study, the researchers tested and compared the nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples of around 2,000 people in Japan who did not demonstrate Covid-19 symptoms.

Takanori Teshima from Hokkaido University in Japan said in the study: “Rapid detection of asymptomatic infected individuals will be critical for preventing Covid-19 outbreaks within communities and hospitals.”

Methodology

Researchers carried out two virus amplification tests on the collected samples for study: the widely available PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, and the less commonly used RT-LAMP test.

Also read: Saliva swab test better in detecting Covid-19 than nasal swab test: Study

Both the tests yielded almost the same number of positive and negative outcomes, with the nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples able to detect those with the infection in 77-93 per

Read More

A research study forthcoming in The Accounting Review measures how effective the Securities and Exchange Commission is at detecting financial misreporting.

The SEC Division of Corporation Finance reviews the financial filings of publicly traded corporations and, at times, sends comment letters to companies if it has questions about perceived deficiencies in a filing. In his study titled “Examining the Examiners: SEC Error Detection Rates and Human Capital Allocation” Assistant Professor Matthew Kubic from the University of Texas at Austin analyzed 13,429 comment letter reviews between 2004 and 2014.

In 1,829 of the cases, the comment letter review covered an annual or quarterly financial filing that was eventually restated, implying that the SEC could have detected the error in their review. Kubic then examined the nature of

Read More